.NET Training

Just a quick note to apologize for not posting much of substance this week. I have been going to .NET training sessions at work which start at 8 AM and end at 6 PM each day, around which I have to squeeze my current project at work, and the rest of my life.  In a word: busy busy busy.  Well three words, actually.

.NET is an interesting technology.  There are some improvements on the Java model, and some other things I prefer about Java.  I'll tell you one thing, it beats the hell out of C++.  Gotta run, more later.


Civic Duty Done

Well Pat and I managed to squeak into the polls at 7:30 PM tonight.  Ours were votes numbers 315 and 316.   Talk about poor turnout!  Looks like Deval Patrick and Tim Murray will be the team going up against Healey. (Primary results at boston.com.)  My boy Stephen Dinatale seems to have won a landslide for Worcester Third State Rep, and a hearty don't-let-the-door-hit-you-on-the-rear to Emile Goguen, (you all know where I stand on THIS guy), who is vacating the seat.  My choice for Governor's Council, John Burke, appears to have been defeated by a large margin.  It's too bad really, he was the only candidate of the five running who was from Fitchburg.  And Galvin won Secretary of State by a bajillion votes.  I've seen some large margins in my time but 83% of the vote is impressive.

Happy Birthday Tom!

Just wanted to take a brief moment here to wish my friend, Tom King, a Happy 39'th Birthday!  Please join me in wishing Tom a pleasant day.  Tom, I hope you're kicking your feet up and relaxing today.  I'll be thinking of you today with a grin on my face and a lightness in my step.  (And not just because I'm a month younger than you are.)  (Well okay, not completely because I'm a month younger than you are.)

(Hey, I'm a month younger than you are… have I mentioned that lately?)

Happy Day Tom!

FYI You Might Not Be Strong to the Finish…

Here's what we know, there are bags of fresh cut spinach circulating in our country that are contaminated with E. Coli bacteria.  Several people have gotten sick in Wisconsin, Connecticut, and other places.  At present they have not been able to narrow the problem to a particular brand of spinach or a particular lot number.  So please, if you've bought bagged spinach recently, toss it until they get this one nailed.  The news articles caution that washing the spinach will not protect you.  I heard this on the news this morning, but I'll give a tip of the hat to PurpleCar for reminding me I wanted to post about it…

From Fresh Bagged Spinach E. Coli Warning By FDA (Medical News Today):
After at least 50 people, spanning 8 US states, came down with E. Coli poisoning and one person died, the FDA has warned people not to consume fresh bagged spinach. The FDA is not completely sure the spinach is to blame, but believes it is most likely. The bacteria strain has been identified as O157:H7.

Up to late yesterday the states affected were:

– Wisconsin (1 death, 20 ill)
– Connecticut
– Idaho
– Indiana
– Michigan
– New Mexico
– Oregon
– Utah

Dr. David Acheson, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (FDA), says the agency is advising people not to eat fresh-bagged spinach.

Apparently, the E. coli is so tightly attached that even washing the spinach does not guarantee you will not be protected, according to Robert Brackett, Director, Center for Food Safety and Nutrition…

Scary!


Oldest American Writing Discovered

Some Mexican road workers uncover a strange stone block covered with hieroglyphs while building a road.  Then, nearly 10 years later, a team of archaeologists get a look at it and detemine that it is the only existing example of the writing of the Olmec people, and the oldest surviving writing in North or South America.  How cool is that?

From UA archaeologist helps ID writing as Americas' oldest (The Birmingham News):
…The slab, known by researchers as the “Cascajal Block,” was found by road builders in the late-1990s. It is carved from the mineral serpentine, a grayish-green stone. It includes 62 distinct symbols, some of which are repeated. The researchers date the symbols to about 900 B.C. The form of writing it contains was previously unknown to scholars.

[University of Alabama archaeology Professor Richard] Diehl suspects that some scholars will question whether the find is authentic, whether it contains actual writing and whether the dating is accurate. But he is confident of the paper's conclusions.

As to what the inscription means, “We have no idea,” Diehl said. “I don't know if we ever will.”

Diehl has studied the Olmec for about 40 years and is considered one of the world's leading authorities on the civilization, which rose about 1500 B.C. and lasted until 400 B.C. In 1967, when Diehl was 26, he was a field director on a Yale University archaeological project in the jungles of San Lorenzo, Mexico. The group discovered 13 monuments, including colossal stone heads, some of which weighed approximately 10 tons. The inscribed stone was found about a mile from that original site, an Olmec city believed to have been the first city in the western hemisphere…


Save DOVE!

My cousin Kristin volunteers at a special shelter in Quincy for victims of domestic violence.  The organization that offers the shelter, DOVE (DOmestic Violence Ended), has learned that the Department of Social Services is terminating its funding.

Kristin and my Aunt Rosalind are organizing a rally on at the State House on October 3rd to get DOVE's funding reinstated.  I'm including the news article here for anyone who might be interested in attending.  Unfortunately I will be unable to attend myself, but if you can help in any way, it will be appreciated.

Originally printed at Banker & Tradesmen:

Advocates Mobilizing Forces to Save Emergency Shelter
By Aglaia Pikounis

Supporters of domestic violence victims are planning to hold an Oct. 3 rally at the State House in an effort to save the Quincy-based shelter known as DOVE, or Domestic Violence Ended, from being shut down. Pictured above is a flier for the event.

Advocates for domestic violence victims are urging state officials to save an emergency shelter on the South Shore that has been a refuge for thousands of abused women and their children for more than 25 years.

DOVE, or Domestic Violence Ended, a Quincy-based group that operates an 18-bed shelter and outreach center for victims of domestic violence, learned in August that the Department of Social Services was cutting off its funding.

Kristin Ryan, a Rockland resident who volunteers at DOVE’s shelter, along with her mother, Rosalind Marshall of Quincy, have organized a rally to be held Oct. 3 at the State House in Boston to urge state leaders to restore the funding. Ryan said without the state’s financial support, the shelter may be forced to shut its doors.

“If those doors are allowed to close, women will die. There is no doubt in my mind that women will die and children will too, unfortunately,” said Ryan.

DOVE, which has an operating budget of about $700,000 to run both the shelter and outreach center, has been receiving about $250,000 annually from DSS since the early 1980s, according to Executive Director Stephanie Flaherty. In addition to the state funding, DOVE relies on private donations and grants.

Flaherty, who became executive director last November, said DOVE has not seen a significant change in the funding provided by DSS over the years. The complete elimination of funding this year “very much took us by surprise,” said Flaherty.

After reviewing proposals sent from emergency shelters throughout the state, DSS decided not to renew its contract with DOVE for the new fiscal year, which started July 1.

DSS spokeswoman Denise Monteiro said service providers – including emergency shelters and group homes – with which the agency does business were notified last year that the agency had developed a new set of criteria that vendors would have to meet.

Monteiro said the criteria were developed after a task force visited all of the shelters across the state serving domestic violence victims two years ago, met with clients, and discussed problems and concerns. Last year, DSS funded a total of 69 shelters for battered women statewide, offering 822 beds to victims of domestic violence and their children.

DSS notified shelters and other vendors about the new criteria so they “had a full sense of what we were looking for” and so they could make adjustments to their services accordingly, according to Monteiro.

Compared to other shelters seeking a DSS contract, DOVE failed to meet some basic requirements, said Monteiro, including having the ability to effectively serve a diverse clientele and having a network in place so that clients can access transportation and other direct services easily.

“They were at the bottom rung,” Monteiro said of DOVE.

Flaherty said DSS has temporarily extended DOVE’s contract, which was set to expire on Sept. 30, through the end of December.

‘A Larger Public Safety Issue’
DOVE wasn’t the only program to get its shelter funding cut. In western Massachusetts, the New England Learning Center for Women in Transition, or NELCWIT, sought over $900,000 in funding but received just $125,000 for its community-based services.

Sarah Dudzic, executive director of NELCWIT, said the Greenfield-based group applied for approximately $267,000 to help operate its 18-bed shelter and about $467,000 for its community-based services. DSS declined to provide any shelter funding, but with the help of local legislators, Dudzic said DSS restored another $100,000 in funding.

Still, the group, which has been receiving DSS money to run its shelter for at least eight to 10 years, is struggling to keep the shelter open.

“We feel strongly that we want to keep our shelter open. That’s always been the priority throughout this crisis,” said Dudzic. “We’re trying to run the shelter at reduced capacity and really on a shoestring or austerity budget.”

If the shelter does shut down, Dudzic said she anticipates that local police and fire departments will be dealing with more emergency calls related to domestic violence, and there will be a rise in emergency room visits.

“It’s more than just how we are going to shelter women. In addition to that, it’s about a larger public safety issue than just a woman and her abuser,” she said.

Meanwhile, DOVE officials are planning to meet with DSS on Oct. 16 to discuss its funding, according to Flaherty.

“We are still trying to work with the department to find out why our funding was cut,” said Flaherty, who noted that DOVE also is searching for alternative sources of funding.

“The reality is, without the supplemental funding [from the state], it doesn’t look promising,” she added.

Flaherty said DOVE is working with local and state leaders, including state Sen. Michael Morrissey, D-Quincy, to see if funding can be restored. It also is planning its annual fund-raiser and cocktail party for Oct. 18 at the Granite Links Golf Club in Quincy.

DOVE’s shelter, created in 1978, served 152 women and 149 children during the last fiscal year and had to turn away 154 families who sought assistance because the shelter was full.

Ryan, who volunteers twice a week at DOVE’s shelter, said she has never seen a vacant bed at the shelter in the four years she’s been volunteering. Most of the women who come to the shelter have children, she added.

Flaherty said if the shelter shuts down, there is only one other shelter between Boston and Cape Cod that is specifically designed for victims of domestic violence: Womansplace in Brockton. Funding for the Womansplace shelter, which has 12 beds, was slashed by one-third this year.

Women fleeing abusive relationships can go to other emergency shelters, but they won’t be guaranteed the confidentiality and safety that comes from women’s shelters, explained Flaherty.

Mary Lauby, executive director of Jane Doe – a statewide coalition of domestic violence and sexual assault programs throughout the state – has tried to get information from DSS about the number of shelter beds that will be available to abused women this year, but the agency hasn’t provided the number because it is still negotiating contracts.

“Because the process isn’t finished, we don’t know and can’t predict what that number is,” she said.

Lauby said there has been no increase in funding for domestic violence programs in many years. “You can’t continue to split a pie in more ways and expect the same sort of services to be provided,” she said.

If DOVE has to close its shelter, Lauby said, the community will be losing an important resource that not only has provided beds for abused women, but also has educated volunteers and the public about domestic violence issues and provided advocacy in the courts.

Ryan, determined to get more support for DOVE from the state, hopes to draw at least 100 protesters to the Oct. 3 rally.

“We can’t let it close,” she said.


On Being Censored

Let me tell you, it's no fun.  Especially when you are someone who spends as much time to writing posts or comments as I am.  Since discovering the Twin Cities Blog recently, I've been dropping comments on it from time to time.  And all was well until a few days ago.  You see the Twin Cities blog is moderated, and therefore comments made to them are held for approval before they appear on the blog.  And apparently, someone there doesn't appreciate my point of view…

At first it was fine, but starting a couple days ago, my comments stopped being approved for posting, even though there is nothing inappropriate about them.  In the meantime, several much nastier and rude comments betraying a conservative viewpoint have made it through.  Let me tell you, nothing sucks more than putting forth a reasonable and reasoned argument after spending an hour or so writing it up and editting it, only to have it silently rejected.  Apparently they aren't interested in discussion over at the Sentinel and Enterprise.

It certainly casts serious doubt on their journalistic integrity there.  Ah well.  It's their blog, they can do what they want with it.


Massachusetts Governor — Who's it Gonna Be?

Well unfortunately I missed the second debate (had to work late). But I did read about it this morning. It's a real toss up for me right now… I'm in a difficult quandary…

We seem to have reached the point in the race where it turns really negative (now that there is a front runner in Deval Patrick) and this is always the part I like the least. Watching the candidates snipe at each other generally doesn't help me decide who will do the best job in office.

All of the candidates strike me as vague, none of them, as far as I can see, are producing anything more detailed than “I'm gonna do this, I'm gonna do that.” Healey for her part seems to be trying to make the race be about taxes, and so far the Dems seem to be letting her suck them into that discussion.

*

If you make $100,000 a year, 5.3% is $5,300. Rolling back those taxes to 5% puts $300 bucks in your pocket (which is spread out over an entire year of paychecks, amounting to $5.77 a week… about the price of a whopper and fries.) Viewed from the top-down perspective, that 0.3% accounts for 6% of the state's budget which is a pretty big chunk of change that now isn't going to social services that benefit YOU.

Between you and me, I'm not willing to trade my daughter's school or a policeman's salary for a weekly whopper and fries, or even for $300 in the bank.

Guys, knock it off. You let your opponent set the agenda, you lose. Never play the other guy's game. It doesn't take a genius to realize that rolling back taxes from 5.3% to 5% amounts to pocket change for the average citizen, and a major loss for the state.* Democrats aren't that stupid.

At present, for me anyway, Reilly is definitely out. Both Patrick and Gabrieli are pretty good matches for my values, with Patrick probably edging out Gabrieli. But Gabrieli seems to be able to handle himself better in a debate, and whoever I vote for is going to have to go up against Kerry Healey. That said, Healey issued a debate challenge to the democratic candidates back in April, and of the big three, only Patrick accepted the challenge (perhaps to help legitimize his candidacy, who knows). Although I wouldn't have a problem voting for Gabrieli, he comes across as less sincere than Patrick. I remember looking over his “Deal with Voters” flyer and thinking two things:

  1. Reminds me of the utterly insincere and poll-driven “Contract With America“, the brainchild of that jerk Newt Gingrich.
     
  2. What candidate wouldn't promise these things? How does this set him apart from anyone else? “I'll eliminate wasteful spending and prevent Big Dig-like cost overruns.” Well duh.

I don't want to sound like I hate Gabrieli, I don't. I think he's a fine candidate. I'm just having trouble deciding in that tradeoff between the best fit for my values and the candidate that can beat Healey.

So for me it's Gabrieli or Patrick. And it's going to be a tough decision. Who's got your vote?


Stupid Anti Gay Marriage Argument #15

Back in July the Twin Cities Blog (a blog for the local Sentinel & Enterprise newspaper serving Fitchburg, Leominster, and the surrounding communities) posted a simple question

Do you think state lawmakers should vote to ban same-sex marriage?

As you can imagine this drew a lot of commentary.  And as usual, I was disgusted with how many people in my area want to take rights away from a minority group.  Have we learned nothing?  I couldn’t be bothered to comment on it at the time as it would have just gotten me too riled.  But one irritating comment stood out:

Homosexuals ARE equal under the law. They may marry whom ever they want. Just not someone of the same gender. Period.

About 2 years ago I summarized 16 common arguments against gay marriage here on ULev.  That post was largely edited from many lengthy comments I posted on Aces Full of Links’ immortal article “Top Twelve Reasons Against Gay Marriage” back in February of 2004.  At the time I never bothered to cover the argument offered above, but it is an argument I’ve heard repeatedly both before and since.  And I’m sick of it, because it betrays the same double standard and lack of insight that so many of the standard arguments do.  So, here’s a brief refutation of this argument against Gay Marriage.

Imagine that tomorrow, the marriage laws of our nation suddenly changed as follows: marriage is only defined as a union between two people of the same gender.

In that case, heterosexuals would be able to marry whomever they wanted.  Just not someone of the opposite gender.  Period.

Would you then be so hot to declare that heterosexuals are equal under the law?  Or would you be fighting tooth and nail to get the right to marry the person you loved, regardless of their gender?  You and I both know the answer to that (which is a nice way of saying you’re not fooling anybody).

If you were really concerned about equality, you wouldn’t be presenting this argument, which means you’re concerned about something else, and doing a very poor job of hiding it behind this flimsy argument.  These are basic rights of our fellow citizens we’re talking about here.  It is extremely inappropriate of you to argue semantics, especially when you wouldn’t hold the position if the situation were reversed.

Regarding other arguments against gay marriage, I’ve devoted a new page to summarizing the problems with these arguments. It’s all stuff you’ve heard me say before, but do look it over and let me know what you think. Are there any arguments you’ve heard that I haven’t included? Am I just plum wrong?


Coggshall Geese Redux

Just a followup to Saturday's story about the canada geese in Coggshall Park and the local hunter who was proposing he be allowed to shoot them to keep the population under control.  I heard back from both the Mayor and the Recreation Director in response to the letter I sent

It would be inappropriate of me to include their messages here, but I can summarize them for you.

Mayor Mylott said that at present he and the Park Commission feel that they don't have enough information to make a decision regarding the hunter's proposal, and that they are going to talk to the Fisheries and Wildlife Department to see if there really is a problem, and if there is what they think should be done about it.  I think this is a prudent course of action, which is why I suggested it in my letter.

Recreation Director Roy told me that basically my suggested courses of action are what the Park Board will do.  He assured me that they were very much aware of the issues I raised (lack of hard data, conflict of interest, public safety, public comfort, and humane treatment of the animals), and that he personally would be in contact with all the appropriate agencies to work out what should be done.  He also noted that the newspaper had “pushed the issue” before a decision had been reached.

So at present the course of action is to bring in experts from the appropriate agencies and have them evaluate the goose population and determine if there is a problem, and make recommendations as to how to deal with it.  This doesn't rule out culling, or even culling by shotgun on Saturday mornings, but it does mean that the decision, when made, will be informed by more than the opinion of one resident.

Sounds good to me!  And as I openly wondered the other day, apparently it doesn't sound good to the guy who made the proposal.

From City spares the geese (Sentinel & Enterprise):
…Donnelly, a Conservation Commission member, said Thursday he thinks emotionalism won out on this issue.

“There's no legal or scientific reason for not allowing this. They're just letting emotion prevail,” he said. “Where emotion prevails, the geese lose.”…

The mayor and park board felt that they wanted to get expert opinions on the matter and investigate nonlethal alternatives before they agree to allow shooting in a public park.  And that's “emotionalism”?